City Squares
I had never thought of belonging to a city as being a human
right. After discussion on Tuesday it became clearer on why it is so important.
That the city becomes a mouthpiece for the inhabitants. Realizing that the
community of the city has the right to adapt and reshape their city to best
suit allows for new development. This brings up the point that the architect
and urban planners are in a pivotal position. When you add the political aspect
to these decisions I am amazed anything gets done or changed. This process reminds
me the importance of participating in elections, whoever is elected has a great
power to influence the built environment. No matter if they decide to develop
or not the position provides the opportunity to change and improve the built
environment to best meet the needs of the citizens. I think back to European traveling
and their urban plans with large piazza to have the city come together for
lectures, or their open air market spaces that became a community in itself as
well. These spaces were laid out with the intention of having the large square
infront of the city hall. These medieval gathering spaces still serve their
purposes. Today in larger cities It seems we are missing these spaces to
provide community engagement. Maybe this lack of an open forum has lent to the
current divide in politics. Could open squares and gathering spaces bridge the
gap of political sides? Or would they provide a space to riot and damage the
city?


I think these large public spaces are what give a city its identity and give its citizens a sense of agency. Everyone needs a space to come together as a community and feel their voices are being heard. These squares provide a space for civil conversation, and as long as someone is listening, there is no need to yell.
ReplyDelete