The Inn at Middleton Place: Critical Regionalism at its Finest


While studying in Charleston, we spent considerable time studying the writings of Kenneth Frampton. One of my favorite projects we visited was The Inn at Middleton Place, a project that I believe demonstrates all six points of critical regionalism very well. For brevity, I want to cover three points in particular: Culture and Civilization, Critical Regionalism and World Culture, and The Visual Versus the Tactile.

Culture And Civilization
The stucco walls, chimney pots, "Charleston Green" paint, wood shutters, the rigor of the floor plan and detailing of the guest rooms are boldly modern yet rooted in historic and local contexts. Frampton laments that today’s architecture often consists of “the provision of a compensatory façade to cover up the harsh realities of this universal system”. The Middleton Inn is such an honest manifestation of its function and its construction. The parti is very simple, a solid pier encompassing the fireplaces separating mirrored guest rooms.

Critical Regionalism and World Culture
Frampton argues that critical regionalism should deal with the impact of universal civilization through architectural elements that are indirectly derived from “the peculiarities of a particular place.” The Middleton Inn was not an attempt by Clark and Menefee to simply revert to nostalgic historicism or revive a hypothetical form of a lost vernacular for the sake of doing so. The Middleton Inn is boldly modern given its location and yet couldn’t be more contextually sensitive. The building artfully bounds an existing scar in the landscape to frame a beautiful and serene place of dwelling for guests.

The Visual Versus the Tactile
All too often architecture is judged on still images. But these images lack the descriptive quality of a building’s tactile qualities. The Middleton Inn is a beautiful example of the richness and depth that is only experienced when walking the grounds. Photos are able to convey the beautiful proportions and evocative modern articulation of the façade. Only when walking the grounds, however, does one truly appreciate the full richness of the place-form. A particularly striking experience when visiting is walking on the raised earth promenade between the lodge and the guest rooms, down into the lawn. There is no more intimate of an interaction with the architecture than in this moment. The two vertical cypress walls frame a view of the lawn beyond but demand your attention with a certain tactile quality. Thirty-three years of weathering has given the cypress panels a depth and rawness that makes one appreciate the careful attention to rather simple detailing. The organic growth traversing the stucco adds an indescribable quality of architecture blending with the landscape. The Inn has the feeling that the building was ever so gently tucked into the bluff and welcomed the landscape to envelope it on its way back to the river.



Comments

  1. Definitely agree! I think it was by far one of my favorite trips for the sole reason that I was able to clearly visualize the readings on Frampton and relate them to a project. All the details that went into the Inn commemorate the local tradition of what is Charleston.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Visiting the Inn at Middleton Place was by far my favorite and the most memorable of our Friday walking tours simply because of its experiential richness and the lasting impression it left on me. His spatial composition of the inn is formally restricted yet contextually appropriate and regionally grounded with the particularities of the site. There was a great juxtaposition in the design as the charred, Charleston Green volumes almost seemed like they were carved out from the heavy concrete cores that really imposed themselves on the landscape yet contrasted with the intricacy of the wooden shutters used on the windows. The form itself contrasted with the wooded background, but the heaviness of the structure was alleviated by the openings in the concrete form that seemed to allow the landscape in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you about the inn being a superb representation of critical regionalism. Although I think that the two points of critical regionalism that the inn really excels in are the resistance of the place-form, and culture vs. nature. In this context, the two points are very closely linked. Clark's design expertly adapted the pre-existing altered conditions of the site, imparting a constraint on the design that in the end, only improved the relationship to the landscape.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I totally agree. The inn is such a good representation of response to the lowcountry's cultural and environmental history and tradition. On our tour, I remember it being said how much better this is compared to a recreated 18th century village like hotel both from a preservation narrative (creating something that had never existed and creating a false narrative) and responding to the phosphorus mining on the property.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts