Engineering the Environment

Over the past decade or more there has been a great focus in LEED buildings.  Clemson University for instance touts the number of LEED buildings on campus, which, according to the website, sits at 21.  LEED is a great initiative in creating more sustainability but as Mostafavi puts it in Ecological Urbanism "But there remains the problem that the moral imperative of sustainability and, by implication, of sustainable design, tends to supplant disciplinary contribution.  Thus sustainable design is not always seen as representing design excellence or design innovation.  This situation will continue to provoke skepticism and cause tension between those who promote disciplinary knowledge and those who push for sustainability, unless we are able to develop novel ways of design thinking that can attribute to both domains."  Essentially, from what I gather, LEED is like a report card, you get points for checking off all the boxes, a certain number of checks will allow you to get the Gold status.  However when you look at a survey of LEED buildings, they are mostly ordinary and mundane.  In this realm of building, design and creativity aren't used as a metric towards becoming a building worth of LEED if they can't meet the minimum requirements.  I really like the point in this week's lectures where we need to stop seeing the environment and the city as two separate problems and instead see them as one interconnected problem.  When you look at the places that is doing this well, look no further than The Netherlands.




This environment is engineered to protect this town from storm surges.  These sanddunes are engineered to break up the surge and double as parking garages that can hold up to 700 cars.  This beach town is popular for tourists but outside the summer seasons it is quiet.  Putting the parking underground allows for the cars to be stored without straining the local infrastructure.  Charleston had a very different response to storm surges, they decided to build a wall on the Battery to fight back surges.  They are now in the midst of building a taller wall to protect the city for the next 50 years.  Their solution works against the environment rather than with it and is in no way as aesthetic as what the dutch did in Katwijk.
A sunken courtyard/basketball court doubles as a cistern to hold stormwater in Rotterdam 
After Hurricane Sandy the town of Rockaway decided to rebuild in a resilient manner.  Usually federal government relief through FEMA involves building back what was destroyed.  the town of Rockaway decided they could do better and build resiliently. They ultimately put their relief funds to a design competition.  The winner selected was White Arkitekter from Stokholm.  Their design titled, "Small means, great ends" focused on building resiliency through a phased-project that would focus small interventions to rebuild the environment to mitigating hurricane damage the next time a "Sandy" passed through.  This approach protected the community both ecologically and economically.


For the sake of brevity I'll end here, but I encourage you all to check out this project!

Comments

  1. Your comments about LEED highlight the inherent issue with regulating/mandating responsible design. I think we all know it can't be done this way. It's a holistic approach where designers must understand the needs of a community and work with its members. Sometimes results aren't apparent for years or decades after project completion. For example, how does someone know if a city's strategy for addressing rising water levels will work until 50-100 years from now?

    LEED got it wrong when they said projects are awarded the day of ribbon cutting. Who knows if the buildings are actually going to follow through. Living Building Challenge improves on this I suppose because buildings can't be up for certification until it's been open and operational for at least 12 months.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Phil, you make an excellent point. The most sustainable building will not achieve maximum effectiveness unless human behavior changes as well. By delaying certification a year, building occupants would have time to implement processes and form habits that make a greater difference over the long run.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A building cannot be sustainable unless the users are using the building in a sustainable manner. LEED just means that there is a possibility for the building to function in a sustainable manner. Without proper maintenance and actual use of the sustainable strategies, it's just another waste of money.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts