Interiors and cities
Architecture, interiors, urbanism – three subjects I’m
passionate about (like many of you) as an architecture student, a former
interior designer, and person who loves spending time in cities.
The relation between architecture and interiors is clear – a
building is holistic being in my opinion, not separate exterior and interior
scopes designed and viewed independently of one another (although unfortunately
that is case many times in practice).
The relation between architecture and cities is also clear.
It’s something we’ve discussed extensively throughout this class and in our
studios.
Besides sharing the common thread of architecture, I’d hardly
considered how cities and interiors pertain to one another. So I was captivated
by the comparison made in class this week between the two when presented with
the idea of reflecting the richness and intricacies of cities in building
interiors.
I think that’s a really beautiful analogy and an accurate
way to describe works from architects like Steven Holl and Peter Zumthor, whose
works create powerful human experiences through tactile mediums.
It also made me think of Scandinavian architecture, which I
really admire. During WW2, Scandinavian designers developed the theory of New
Empiricism, which rejects functionalist and rationalist architecture for a more
humanistic, organic architecture to create a positive human experience in the
built environment, as seen in works from Alvar Aalto and Eero Saarinen.
This idea also seems prevalent in present-day Nordic works.
A project I recently stumbled upon and really admire is The Financial Park
Offices in Stavanger, Norway by Helen + Haard with SAAHA. The way the organic
forms of the circulation paths between the mezzanine interact and weave through
one another remind me of old city streets, beautifully vibrant in diversity and
inviting exploration. I also see parallels to the small pockets of urban space
in more private areas – a conference space hugged by a sloping wall or retreats
off the main circulation paths.
Even as a new building, I think it does an excellent job or
reflecting the richness and intricacies of a city within its enclosed spaces.
Charlotte, thanks for weaving your interior design perspective into your post. Through facades, architects can make statements and add interest to skylines and streetscapes, but interiors matter to people who spend their time living, working, worshiping, and learning indoors. The care that architects and designers take to create fine interiors with good atmosphere could make the difference between a haven (to borrow a word from Peter Zumthor) and a trap. Isn't "inner beauty" most important?
ReplyDeleteGreat post Charlotte! This definitely reminds me Enric Miralles's work. I think his freely formed buildings develop their relationship with the environment and connect themselves to interpret the place, traditions, and history on a personal level much like Alvar Aalto and Eero Saarinen.
ReplyDelete