Natures Blueprints

Referring back to Edward Burtynsky and Manufactured Landscapes he briefly mentions biomimicry. In the discussion of sustainability, technology and building methods, this is something I was drawn to in my undergraduate experience and would like to elaborate on, specifically biomimicry, not just biophilic design - they do differ.
Biomimicry is defined as a design or production of structures, materials, and systems that are inspired by biological entities and processes. Due to the ability of various species to adapt to surroundings and evolve, nature can be seen as a force of progression, sustainability, and functionality. Nature can provide an unused source of innovation that could support the longevity of humanity. All aspects of life – cells, organisms and their ecosystems – are continually sensing and responding to each other. This concept can relate to how buildings, along with other designed elements and objects, the environment and people respond to one another. Biologist Janine Benyus states, “We need to access the natural design blueprints, ecosystem strategies, chemical blueprints and even the purpose that nature has blueprints for. What’s new about biomimicry is we are not harvesting or domesticating species; instead we are evaluating them for what they can learn from them.”
To evaluate the natural world, a look at the approaches of biomimicry can be discussed. There are typically two categories: defining human needs or design problems and looking to the ways other organisms or ecosystems solve this and identifying a characteristic, behavior, or function in an organism or ecosystem and translating that into human designs. Within these approaches there are three levels: the organism level, behavior level, and ecosystem level. Diving deeper into the levels, dimensions of biomimicry exist. A design can be listed as biomimicry through how it looks (form), what it is made of (material), how it is made (construction), how it works (process), and its capabilities (function).

I find it fascinating to consider an approach that utilizes nature and the environment that we are trying to sustain, to sustain itself. Nature has already solved many of the problems we as humans face, so why not learn from these naturally effective methods?
Aerodynamics related to birds and movement

Synthetic materials for self healing


Responsive facades similar to plants protection




The above three images demonstrate how designers modeled HVAC systems after insect species in extreme climates; ie. termite mounds








Comments

  1. You're point about biomimicry is dead on. Although I don't know a lot about this myself. I understand it from a systematic approach... If nature keeps itself alive and does not pollute the earth, than how come buildings can't do the same? Taking ideals that work in nature and using them to create sustainable building strategies needs to be a design solution more and more!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is interesting to look at the way nature behives to sustain itself rather than to look at the way we are forced to behive to sustain the system tha we have created. The obstavle that I see is tha nature's idea of efficincy is to keep a balance (sustainable), our idea of effecincy is to keep increasing our capability to produce (not sustainable).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're exactly right Robert. Nature's definition of sustainability is survival (what is the minimum I need to do to survive?). Humans' definition of survival is growth and production.

      Delete
  3. I really enjoy the breakdown you did at the end of your post. I think the most successful example you shared is the stack effect. I believe that's some sort of insect that has built their nest like that? That's a great example of nature figuring out a way to deal with heat that can be directly applied to architecture.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts