The Sky is Falling
Rem Koolhaas, along with many of us, seem to be under the
impression that the sky is falling, that the apocalypse of architecture is upon
us. We must repent of the sin of
building shopping malls and big box stores and save the world from itself. People don’t know what they want, we must
educate them, inform them about what is good and what is junk.
Does Koolhaas really think that “junkspace” is a modern
creation? His glorification of ancient
architecture is derived from nothing more than nostalgia. Is something better just because it lasts a
long time? Do we really believe that the
romantic paintings of Roman cities accurately depict the conditions of that
time? Of course there was “junkspace”
back then too. His definition of “junkspace”
seems to be any place where the common person has access to or enjoys
being. Too many people begin inhabiting
an environment and suddenly it is defiled, relegated to “junkspace.” He is the ultimate architecture hipster – it’s
only cool before it goes mainstream.
A drive to improve and better society is critical to
architecture or any profession. The
problem comes in when we become nothing more than critics who stand on the
sideline and point out everything that we see as “junk.” We’ve got to get down out of our ivory tower
and start thinking about how people really live. Is architecture even relevant anymore? What are we even talking about? Wal-mart is “bad” because it doesn’t have
enough windows? Because you can’t walk
to it? If people want to go to a big box
store to buy everything on their shopping list in one place, who are we to tell
them that they shouldn’t?
Ironically, we live in a political and social time which
praises tolerance – do whatever you want to do, be yourself, don’t conform, don’t
judge people, be politically correct – oh, but don’t go to shopping malls or
big box stores. And don’t live in the
suburbs. Even though we all do.
Come on, Koolhaas, what world are you living in? I say the emperor has no clothes.
Spencer, you point out at a very important issue. How can architects be critical of the ruling system and its main actors art the same time? We should discuss this in class.
ReplyDeleteSpencer and Professor Franco, I think you both bring up a great point about the need for, but current lack of, real architectural criticism from the profession. Dependent on current social, political, and financial constructs, the profession of architecture consistently takes a back seat in the public criticism of its own work, especially in regards to Junkspace. Everyone is doing it, and needs to do it to make money, so why not? Koolhaas says "Masterpiece...is [now] a consistent typology" with a "mission to intimidate" all into submission and ultimately praise. With the success of architecture based on the trust of the client, community, and ultimately society, how can we justify criticism of the very fabric of current culture when we depend on it to survive?
ReplyDelete