Manifestos and the Denial of Man

I’m … bout … to … rant. My thoughts regarding the works of architects such as Eisenman, Libeskand, Gehry, and many more, all at altering degrees of absurdity, are as follows; the lack of consideration for the human experience at the FOREFRONT of design is distressing. I guess I should say ‘in my opinion’. Experimentations with geometries and operations, hidden from the rest of us but divinely revealed by your lucid investigations, fail to manifest a resolution beyond “Woah”. I find it, frankly, selfish. Your endeavors, however aw-creating, are manufactured in a sort of sadistic isolation, absent from the non-corporate, rejective of, let’s call it, reality, and arbitrarily defined. These logic-driven, indexial (hope I understood this term correctly) designs are still self-derived, and therefore not conquest of universal truths. I think its BS. Now, to bring this thing full-circle… there is a small, really minute, portion of me that finds intrigue in the crazy, the radical, the different. But I always concede to the notion of objects operating in a vacuum, absent of man’s presence, being best left on paper.