Everyday Urbanism Meets Critical Race Theory
CRT has several rich tenets; but to
be brief, I have focused on just a few that stood out as I read “Everyday
Urbanism.” First, I found two CRT tenets—(a) race is a social
construction and (b) racism as ordinary and normal—to be similar to Margaret
Crawford’s conclusions about the urban environment:
- “The utterly ordinary reveals a fabric of space and time defined by a complex realm of social practices-a conjuncture of accident, desire, and habit.”
- “Lefebvre was the first philosopher to insist that the apparently trivial everyday actually constitutes the basis of all social experience and the true realm of political contestation.”
CRT
scholars would agree that ordinary space is politically-charged and characterized
by small, everyday offenses that are not obvious to most members of the majority.
These micro-aggressions could range from an over-representation of majority
narratives to other barriers that exclude.
Historic Charleston, SC |
Crawford described urbanism as "a human and social discourse.” The changing urban landscape combined with the practice of community engagement provide opportunities to incorporate authentic counter stories into contemporary towns and cities. As a final thought, I would argue that Arnstein’s Ladder of Participation could serve as a measuring stick for how well architects honor those stories.
Arnstein's Ladder of Participation |
As "messy" as citizen participation may be, I really do appreciate and am curious about the outcomes of using Arnsteins Ladder of Participation to check ourselves. I believe there are many professions that could use this method to improve their practice and work. But in terms of the built environment and how it can shape in include or exclude, this could be an interesting case study application.
ReplyDeleteAudrey, I had not considered it before reading your comment, but the Ladder of Participation could support an profession involving interpersonal communications, providing a guide for understanding the balance of power in a relationship. Good point!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete