Everyday Urbanism Meets Critical Race Theory


Through my education courses, I have learned about Critical Race Theory (CRT). Early critical race theorists were legal scholars offering a framework for studying and ending racism in the United States, but many of their ideas are applicable to disciplines beyond the law, including education and architecture. Additionally, CRT overlaps with theories that consider the marginalization of other demographic groups.
CRT has several rich tenets; but to be brief, I have focused on just a few that stood out as I read “Everyday Urbanism.” First, I found two CRT tenets—(a) race is a social construction and (b) racism as ordinary and normal—to be similar to Margaret Crawford’s conclusions about the urban environment:
  • “The utterly ordinary reveals a fabric of space and time defined by a complex realm of social practices-a conjuncture of accident, desire, and habit.”
  • “Lefebvre was the first philosopher to insist that the apparently trivial everyday actually constitutes the basis of all social experience and the true realm of political contestation.”
CRT scholars would agree that ordinary space is politically-charged and characterized by small, everyday offenses that are not obvious to most members of the majority. These micro-aggressions could range from an over-representation of majority narratives to other barriers that exclude.

Historic Charleston, SC
A third CRT tenet “praxis” calls on reformers to embrace social justice agendas to dismantle systems of racism. They suggest that honoring the cultural capital and counter storytelling of marginalized people are some of the best ways to fill the gaps in the historical and cultural record.
Crawford described urbanism as "a human and social discourse.” The changing urban landscape combined with the practice of community engagement provide opportunities to incorporate authentic counter stories into contemporary towns and cities. As a final thought, I would argue that Arnstein’s Ladder of Participation could serve as a measuring stick for how well architects honor those stories.
Arnstein's Ladder of Participation

Comments

  1. As "messy" as citizen participation may be, I really do appreciate and am curious about the outcomes of using Arnsteins Ladder of Participation to check ourselves. I believe there are many professions that could use this method to improve their practice and work. But in terms of the built environment and how it can shape in include or exclude, this could be an interesting case study application.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Audrey, I had not considered it before reading your comment, but the Ladder of Participation could support an profession involving interpersonal communications, providing a guide for understanding the balance of power in a relationship. Good point!

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts