Improving Suburbia
I do not think it is right to talk of suburbia housing as "inefficient" or "contributing to climate change". These are real people, with a right to live where and how they like (within reason). Certainly, having your own house on your own land is a real dream for many people (myself included). Should it be prohibited for people to live in suburbs in the pursuit of greater "efficiency"? I am reminded of CS Lewis' principle of First and Second things. It's very good, so I will quote it at length here.
"Until quite modern times — I think, until the time of the Romantics — nobody ever suggested that literature and the arts were an end in themselves. They “belonged to the ornamental part of life”, they provided “innocent diversion”; or else they “refined our manners” or “incited us to virtue” or glorified the gods. The great music had been written for Masses, the great pictures painted to fill up a space on the wall of a noble patron’s dining-room or to kindle devotion in a church; the great tragedies were produced either by religious poets in honour of Dionysus or by commercial poets to entertain Londoners on half-holidays.
It was only in the nineteenth century that we became aware of the full dignity of art. We began to “take it seriously”… But the result seems to have been a dislocation of the aesthetic life in which little is left for us but high-minded works which fewer and fewer people want to read or hear or see, and “popular” works of which both those who make them and those who enjoy them are half ashamed… by valuing too highly a real, but subordinate good, we have come near to losing that good itself.
The longer I looked into it the more I came to suspect that I was perceiving a universal law… The woman who makes a dog the centre of her life loses, in the end, not only her human usefulness and dignity but even the proper pleasure of dog-keeping. The man who makes alcohol his chief good loses not only his job but his palate and all power of enjoying the earlier (and only pleasurable) levels of intoxication. It is a glorious thing to feel for a moment or two that the whole meaning of the universe is summed up in one woman — glorious so long as other duties and pleasures keep tearing you away from her. But clear the decks and so arrange your life (it is sometimes feasible) that you will have nothing to do but contemplate her, and what happens? Of course this law has been discovered before, but it will stand re-discovery. It may be stated as follows: every preference of a small good to a great, or partial good to a total good, involves the loss of the small or partial good for which the sacrifice is made.Apparently the world is made that way… You can’t get second things by putting them first; you can get second things only by putting first things first."
Ok, off the tangent. We want to improve suburbia, how? Just like this:
Done. It's improved. Next? Easier said than done, but once you know what the goal is, it's much easier to move in that direction. Next stop, Small Town USA.
Love C.S. Lewis, and I found it really interesting how you applied this principle here. As professionals, we will have to make many decisions prioritizing one thing over another. And we have to constantly ask ourselves, what is First and what is Second? Personally, I see too many reasons why people want to live in suburbia to just dismiss that over differing opinion.
ReplyDeleteGreat post Lee. Loved your stance on first and second. I think these are facts and I also refected on the last picture. Seems like it will suburbia is becoming a reflection of many cities center and well, it becomes harder to control something once it start becoming a trend. Also proximity to things we need daily kind of push for this idea of needing to drive less and have evertything within reach. it has its ups and downsides effects but the latter are worst since they open the doors to more developpers, gentrification, and somehow loss of certain community values overtime.
ReplyDelete