HOSPITALITY VS HOSTILITY

As discussed in this weeks classes, architecture in public spaces can begin to tow the line between hostile and hospitable. However at what point does the intended solution become more exclusive and divisive among different social groups and economic classes? The argument that architecture should not prevent a group of people from partaking in a specific function or program is valid but it is also not right for these functions or programs to become avoided or polluted spaces due to improper use. Public spaces such as parks that we discussed in class are one of these places that need to be for all. By a people group abusing the program and intended use of this space they themselves cause it to become an exclusive area. It was not intended for nor does the majority of the users who are shaping that space desire it to be ones living quarters or dumping grounds for expression through graffiti art. These greater social issues must be circumvented through another means of architecture such as affordable housing that is still well designed and desirable and through varying social programs.