Why is architecture political?
During this week’s lecture, I kept asking myself why is architecture so political? I was then reminded that architecture is the grandest and most permanent marker of civilization, and a clear expression of power by society. We use architecture and the built environment as a means of expression, whether political or now. When looking deeper into the relationship of politics and architecture, we can see that politics influence architecture through the use of codes, regulations, laws, and funding. I understand the need for regulation for the sense of safety but often times architecture is dictated by political power which can negatively impact the user, the space, and the environment if not carefully understood. There is no distance between politics and architecture, just a fine line that we have to tip toe.
Autumn, this is an interesting realization you've made about politics in architecture. One can even notice this in the style used for civic and government buildings, especially that of the Neo-Classical in the original federal buildings in D.C. The use of monumental columns, domes, and symmetrical shapes makes a passerby aware of the building's use.
ReplyDelete