No Place? No Problem.

 

(This is last week's post)

“The bulldozing of an irregular topography into a flat site is clearly a technocratic gesture which aspires to a condition of absolute placelessness, whereas the terracing of the same site to receive the stepped form of a building is an engagement in the act of ‘cultivating’ the site.” -Kenneth Frampton

 

On my daily drive from Spartanburg to Clemson every day, I pass numerous construction sites on the side of the highway that previously held forests or old warehouses that have been completely wiped clear in preparation for something new. People have a desire due to budget or simply just ease to start from a blank slate when building a new office building or neighborhood or library. Wiping the existing site out does simplify the design process, but it creates a “placeless” place where anything can be built, regardless of the previous context. I believe this contributes to the disconnect that we as architects can feel when trying to create a sense of community and togetherness. Oftentimes, the most impactful buildings are the ones that are integrated in their existing site – the topography, the existing landscaping, or other buildings. 

Comments

  1. Lydia,

    I agree that the most impactful buildings are the ones that are integrated in their existing site – the topography, the existing landscaping, or other buildings. Begining from a blank slate is an easy and cheap way to build architecture. But sometimes, it loses the possibilities to be more exciting and attractive, also, miss the opportunities to design some creative space and place.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts