The Importance of Civil Engagement
“Architects are by nature and pursuit, leaders, and teachers. If architecture is going to inspire community, or stimulate the status quo in making responsible environmental and social structural changes now and in the future, it will take what I call the ’subversive leadership’ of academicians and practitioners to remind the student of architecture that theory and practice are not only interwoven with one’s culture but with the responsibility of shaping the environment, of breaking up social complacency, and challenging the power of the status quo.” - Samuel Mockbee, “The Rural Studio”
Architecture is intrinsically linked
to politics and society. Contemporary notions associated with “spatial justice”
include spatial equity [accessibility], spatial democracy [participation], and
spatial diversity [acceptance]. But
to what extent should an architect be involved with civil engagement? Is it our
job to inspire a better community, or to actively be a part of the decision-making
process? Or should we leave this for those who are elected to office? Perhaps
our job is to just help facilitate the right discussions – through design?
Samuel Mockbee has a very clear stance
on this issue. Through Rural Studio, Mockbee’s projects act as a servant for
humanity. These small, modest designs bridge the gap between the “prestige” of
our profession with the needs of our community. Our talents should be used
solve the issues that our neighbors face – through a balanced understanding of
economics and the natural environment.
Architect Michael Hopkins makes an interesting
counterargument to this narrative. When asked what the implications are to two
very different styles of practice – one which serves the community and one
which serves the status quo – he suggested that it is not an architect’s job to
get involved. In his words, ‘Maybe architects shouldn’t be in the position to
make those kinds of decisions.’ [I.e., decisions affecting social, economic,
political, or environmental issues]. Perhaps we should leave these decisions to
those who are elected to solve them. Or perhaps an architect intuitively knows
right from wrong and has the ability to intervene when necessary?
Brittany,
ReplyDeleteI dont think there is a right answer because ultimately we cant leave all these decisions up to one group whether it be the architect, the client or the public because no matter what people will be influenced by money and/or their own political beliefs. I think thats just what we need to realize is that there is no way that we can possibly please everyone so as architects we might as well stay true to our moral compass.