How do the Past and Present become one?
“Essential
in the critical approach of contemporary regionalist architecture is in
addition to confronting the way mainstream buildings are designed, the
questioning of the legitimacy of the very thoughts which lead to their design,
and through which people use and appreciate these buildings”
In the
Critical Regionalism reading from Tzonis and Lefaivre I very quickly came to
appreciate their observations on regionalism and their strong opposition to mainstream
or universal practices, saying that this standardization of design components
and therefore the elimination of values related to climate, the individual, or
site makes the relevance of the place practically eliminated. I think this critical
approach to regional design brings up one of the largest critiques of New
Urbanism, and forces us to constantly question the location of the place by
providing unique design solutions. In addition to this rigorous questioning of
place this balance of familiarization or defamiliarization brings up another
interesting conversation in how do the past and the present become one? This
idea of familiarization or architecture as a “memory machine”, significant to romantic
regionalism, seems inevitable to me. I find that there’s a beauty in the
evocative power of architecture can easily provide a “spatial trigger” for
activating a memory, unique to those of our own personal and human experiences.
Critical regionalism however distinguishes itself by encouraging us to
incorporate these memory’s or sentimental scenes “strangely rather than
familiarly”. Frankly I’m not exactly sure how, what, or why it is asking this
of me as a designer besides playing this game of mystery or curiosity. I
completely appreciate the intent to create a “renewed” sense of place in our
time based on a critical approach but I think there’s a really delicate balance
between learning from the past and new modern defamiliarization. I’m a firm
believer that “building can make us see a few steps ahead that which is
actually situated back many centuries”
You don't need to look very far to get an example of this. Your Hayesville project (use of an existing structure; reproduction of a traditional roof line changing the scale; systematic program with free organization; and so on) would be a clear example of what Tzonis and Lefaivre talk about.
ReplyDelete