Edge Effect
During my
semester in Barcelona, the only other Clemson grad student (a landscape grad) and
I asked to work together on our semester project. This wasn’t taken well at
first - the professors wanted graduate students to have their own projects
since it would essentially be double the work of the undergrads. But we soon
convinced them with an argument about collaboration or something. Really, we
were just hoping we could keep each other motivated to work on studio amidst
the distractions of Barcelona.
What
happened was more than I could ask for. By the end, we were both deeply
involved in the “other” discipline. It was hardly landscape vs building - that
delineation was long gone. We had taken over our entire site and even proposed
further expansion within a 9-block radius.
The night
before the final review, we finished all our work around 11pm and still had a
blank space for the name of the project. So we called in a few friends, handed
them a glass of wine and began to explain our work in hopes of some last-minute
inspiration. We settled on an ecological concept that we’d been using to
describe our project for a while: the Edge Effect. It described the greater
diversity of life found in the region where two adjacent ecosystems overlap. In
this region, there exist species from both ecosystems as well as unique species
specially adapted to conditions of the transition zone. Below is Ian McHarg’s diagram
that starts to illustrate this process.
This was
relevant on many different scales for us: most obviously, our site was something
of a transition between the Sagrada Familia (across the street) and the
Barcelona grid. And then on the most personal level, we also realized the
gradient between the divisions of architecture and landscape architecture. With
this project, it became so clear to me that making the collaboration between architecture
and landscape architecture normal creates a new and better understanding of the
possibilities of public space. The plants were not the stars of the show and neither
were the humans, rather it focused on connecting and creating environments at a
variety of scales, something I truly hope to take with me in future work.
Your project sounds like it was beautiful! In many ways, it frustrates me that landscape architecture and architecture are separate in the academic realm, because as you say the divisions can and should become quite blurred. I think the blurring of this line makes for the most beautiful projects.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you and Madison on the academic potential for working across disciplines (different disciplines, same field? anyways) Not that I didn't enjoy working with undergrads during the fluid studio semesters. However I think it would be more beneficial for grad students at least to blur the lines horizontally (with landscape and maybe even healthcare). As it is right now, I don't believe that the fluid studio curriculum is reaching its full potential.
ReplyDeleteGreat Post! I think it's a great idea to collaborate outside the profession, and I can definitely see academia being the perfect realm to explore this radically, for example, what would happen if we paired an architect and a music producer for a project... cool things could happen here
ReplyDelete