The Primitive Envelope
"The
building envelope is possibly the oldest and most primitive architectural
element. It materializes the separation of the inside and outside, natural and
artificial and it demarcates private property and land ownership (one the most
primitive political acts). When it becomes a façade, the envelope operates also
as a representational device in addition to its crucial environmental and
territorial roles." – Alejandro
Zaera, “The Politics of the Envelope”
During his lecture “Twelve Ecologies of
the Envelope” at Columbia University, Alejandro Zaera elaborates on his theory
of building façade. Simply put, it is outdated and has been so for nearly 100
years. In the recent past, the envelope has been analyzed by architects as a two-dimensional
interface. We have a tendency to design space in plan and section, studying
program adjacencies and a building’s relationship with the ground beneath it.
The façade is an afterthought, a symbolic wall separating the designed interior
from the outside world. It is merely a problem of representation.
According to Zaera, this plane is no
longer just a physical boundary – it is a literal embodiment of processes. New technical
possibilities are so powerful and have increased the expectation of our clients.
This advancement has led to façade specialization within the profession. Zaera
began his lecture with a series of images from a façade contractor that he was
working with. The images were in pairs, one showing a building rendering and
the other showing its coinciding envelope mockup. The difference in quality
between the mockup and rendering is enormous. The mockup is incredibly well drafted
and sophisticated, showing both knowledge and research. These objects are more
interesting than an image which cannot explain a structure in three dimensions.
I could not agree more with Zaera in this respect. When working on projects in downtown Charleston, you are always required to provide the BAR with a building mockup. This is an opportunity for the architect, the Board, and the public to physically understand a building before it is built. It requires the subcontractors to understand how they will be working together moving forward. It is interesting to see how often a building is either approved or rejected based solely on this mockup. At the end of the day, it does not matter the quality of your representational exterior renderings, if the façade is not successful than neither is the building.
This is so true! I remember watching BAR meetings where the entire project was basically dismissed because of the skin of the building. When aesthetics in a city (especially one like Charleston) is vital to the nostalgia of the place and surrounding context, having a successful exterior shell is a necessity. You can have a great building and no one will see it as great if it ugly on the outside. (Especially from the eyes of someone who is not an architect or does not appreciate interiors as much.
ReplyDelete