Revolutionizing Density
“People can inhabit
anything. And they can be miserable in anything and ecstatic in anything. More
and more I think that architecture has nothing to do with it. Of course, that's
both liberating and alarming.” – Rem Koolhaas
In today’s culture
congestion, the density and infrastructures has an important role as Koolhaas
suggested. He believed that architecture need not be limited to the building of
built “solutions,” but rather could be defined as a mindset, a way of
approaching the world, of designing for growth and decay. By stacking upwards such as high-rises that
separates the different uses. Each plane of a
skyscraper is considered as a virgin land, which the architects have no control
over the specific programs. The skyscraper becomes the great metropolitan destabilizer
that promises perpetual programmatic instability.
He states "Coney Island," as an example
where modern culture discovered its desire "to live inside a fantasy"
in a fabricated, fully urban environment that was the product of compression
and density. It became a true example of capability
of modern technology like lighting, elevator etc. to create a false reality. The unveiling of the "100-Story
Building" was itself a revolution for the metropolis life. The concept of
having a single building that would accommodate multiple niches was unheard of.
The "100-Story Building" had an Interior Golf Course, swimming pool
and much more within one entity. Despite the push for modern changes, there was
still a need for nature integration.
This article I believe
reinforces the fact that urban planning always comes full circle back to its
basic need which is functionality. Rem Koolhaas very well explained this by
giving example of Manhattan which cannot sustain the impact of explicitly
illustrated ideology that is Modernism. However it successfully converts some
of the modern principles to inspire earlier projects of Post Modernism.
In your opinion, do you believe that the 100 Story Building is fully functional?
ReplyDelete