Rock, Paper, Palladio



"The innovative nature of Palladio’s publication was not lost on
his readers. The Four Books on Architecture came to be seen as the
record of a personal oeuvre and, as such, of a new way of defining
architecture." 

--John Habraken: The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built

 What can you say...Palladio can't be beat.

The very site of Palladian plans send me back to freshman year of architecture school. 
The repetition; A,B,C,B,A, perfectly symmetrical, absolutely repetitive, oh for the love of Hierarchy! 

understanding the beauty in the Palladian villa is the bare bones essence of architecture. I am of course bias but still believe each and every architectural education should examine Renaissance Architecture at length. So much of what shapes the built environment today is directly pulled from antiquity. A meticulous logic of hierarchy, order, and proportion are omnipresent in all of Palladio's work. He took this matter very seriously; never deviating from his basic set of rules. 
- I think this is fundamental to architecture.  

That being said....Rules are mean to be broken.

Like I said, each architecture education should start this way..I do not think it should finish that way. Palladio's principles are basic; easy to follow. They should be understood and respected. Once that respect has been establish though, it will surely be time to push those limits. 


High Renaissance 

Low Residánce

Comments

  1. It's interesting to think about Palladio in the context of the discussion of user empowerment. Mainly because Palladio was mainly working in a time when architects only practiced "high architecture." But yes, Palladio's highly regular structures can draw parallels with Habraken and Segal. But the motives couldn't be more different. One is about proportion and order and the other is about resilience and empowering the user.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts