wHaT Is aRChiTeCtUrE ?







I think the idea that I found the most interesting from the readings this week was that of Doppler Architecture in the text by Somol and Whiting. The Doppler effect in physics speaks to how there is no absolute value in the perception of light or sound waves as it varies concerning the distance between the participant and the source. So in the same way, the author draws a comparison to how there is no absolute definition of architecture. For years, people have put forth theories about what the essence of architecture is and attempted to define it fixedly without success. It ends up circling around and around with no conclusion because as rightly observed in the article, “Architecture as a discipline is not a fixed entity - it is an active organism dealing with several autonomous but not individual domains in perpetual transformation.” I think the aspect of creativity and design is key in setting architecture apart. The text states, “Design is what keeps architecture from slipping into a cloud of heterogeneity.” Architects are not just constrained to drawing plans and technical drawing, but through “design’s relation to other disciplines” are in fact relevant to other parts of the design process. Since the domain that architecture encompasses keeps evolving, I think trying to define it in an absolute manner is absolutely pointless. It is not “black or white” but instead lies in many shades of gray. 

Comments

  1. Hey Ruth! I totally agree with your argument that architecture is not a fixed entity. Architecture is ever evolving and arguments generated on the idea of a fixed architecture is often irrelevant and quickly become outdated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think I have to agree with you in the sense that the term 'Architecture' is juts too broad to have a single definition. If there must be one it has to be extremally vague like, "the sum of the built and unbuilt environments", but even this is kind of nonsense. I think the idea of 'Doppler Architecture' is interesting to bring into this conversation because it seems to fit the idea that the practice is actually 'an active organism'.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with your statement that Architecture is an active organism. I think that as long as our world and humankind continues to evolve over time, so will the field of Architecture since we design alongside social and technological advances.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ruth,
    I like your comparison of Architecture to a living organism. Becoming an Architect is like becoming a jack of all trades, you have to be able to understand a little bit about everything so that the design can work and resolve the needs of the intended user. Creativity and flexibility is key to bringing about a successful design.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts