Up and above
These incentives are provided, with the developer agreeing to give back the open or green space. In most cases as in "Central park tower" in New York these amenities and green spaces are provided some 30 floors above the street level. The program is rotated 90 degrees up into the air. These spaces are made available only for the rich and wealthy users of the building. These spaces are not accessible to any public just like a setback space on the street would be. This way of getting around the system to make maximum profits destroys the street life of a city. Metropolis skyscrapers steal the street life and elevate to its exclusive clients. Social interactions suddenly became private interactions. You don’t climb 30 floors to eat a hot dog. Do you? This changes and affects the life in a city to a greater extent.
In this era of exploring the possibility of human life on a planet that’s 80 million miles away, it isn’t surprising that the elevators escalate the street life to 300’ up in the air.
It is interesting to think about that over the last century the most prominent drivers of architecture have primarily been driving by the economy and what will make the most money. Developers push the envelope not because they want to make an impact for the the people around them, but only push the envelope that will fill their pockets. Privatizing for the wealthy and depriving leaving the people behind is becoming to common of a thing.
ReplyDeleteLike Alex said it is based on certain architects who design just for the wealth. I believe if some firms have different morals or standards then their design might look a little different. They might actually design these green spaces in the lower levels to allow for public use. I feel that in New York the Highline is a great mix use green space that helps connect the community and private users with the buildings around it.
ReplyDelete