Experiencing Everyday Urbanism
“If you plan cities for cars and
traffic, you get cars and traffic. If you plan for people and places, you get
people and places.”
Manek Chowk is the central square of
Ahmedabad’s [City in India] oldest district, The Pols. During the day it
is the liveliest market in Ahmedabad where fruits, spices,
traditional steel kitchen and table utensils are sold as well as a section of
bright Indian fabrics. At night the, the square is transformed into a giant
outdoor restaurant complete with tables, chairs, vendor booths and hundreds of
hungry patrons. This tradition of serving food every night of the
year, began in the early 20th Century when hungry workers returned after late
hours of work in the many nearby fabric mills.
While
doing my undergrad studies from this city the most fascinating character of
this chowk that I found was the changeover that happens as the night
approaches. With almost clockwork precision the street vendors execute the
changeover as if the shift changes in a factory. It is busy Commercial Street
during the daytime and acquires a festive character in night.
Human
Scale of Public Spaces Manek Chowk is a small public square of about 2500 sq.
m. Builtup mass are closely placed which helps in mutual shading. The public
spaces of human scale had supported public life through centuries; however, in
the present context they are dominated by vehicles. The built edge offers
opportunities for trading and socializing. A multitude of businesses and their
relation to the neighborhood and the Walled City provide an active, and
relatable human scale to the Chowk and the way it is being used.
However old this
public square is but till date it manages to be the highlight of maximum public
activity in the city. There must have been something right when they say “Streets
in ancient cities were the result of a vision of civilization rather than a
function of the economy.”
I really like your final sentence "streets in ancient cities were the result of a vision of civilization rather than a function of the economy." Back then, the focus was on interaction, whereas today the focus is ease of transportation/access/availability to resources. How do we begin to facilitate these meaningful interactions once more and maximize public social activity? I do think that restricting the use of cars could be beneficial as well as amorphous spaces such as the public square, but do these work in non-cities as well? Could Clemson benefit from these moves or are they more meant for larger cities?
ReplyDelete