New Ideas, but 50 years old ~ an oxymoron?



 “In architecture, new ideas are at least 50 years old.”

This quote from Giancarlo De Carlo’s Architecture’s Public really stood out to me. Since my first year of architecture school, I hear about all of these different design solutions that we are told to incorporate into our projects not because WE want to, but because it SEEMS right. We sometimes make certain solutions and diagramming techniques fit into our initial ideas instead of using diagramming to influence our design. Students are changing their outlook and asking what their purpose is as a modern day student in architecture. We are asked for so much during our years in school, but are these deliverables structured in the correct ways? Which teaching methods should be passed off as new and which should be transformed into something truly new, is a fundamental question schools of architecture should be considering. Last semester we had the opportunity to design the Clemson Design Center Charleston and while studying the school’s premise and teaching methods, we found out there is an opportunity for much growth within the studios.


Comments

  1. I feel like I'm always just trying to do what seems right, what is shown as 'right' and what I'm told is 'right'. I want to experiment and question the structure but when do I have the time? I feel like this 'lets kill the students' vibe is less beneficial to developing curious and innovative minds and more conducive to drones who will pump out stairs.

    Maybe I just have senioritis and am ready to be done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Experimentation is rewarded so long as it is successful. If you try something that does not flush out in the end, sucks to suck - you just got a C in studio. We are definitely operating in an academic environment that idolizes its canons on form and functionalism while pretending to be intellectually robust by requiring a theory course on our way out the door. Architecture for whom? Right now, it's definitely for Dustin Albright.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've always wanted to create, instead of looking at case studies/precedents and implementing strategies (or similar strategies) that are already tried and true to the practice of architecture. And since we're in a period of time within architectural history that cannot be accurately labelled as any "style", how can we establish a way of thinking that is new to architecture and truly ours within the 21st century, besides being more focused on sustainability?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts