Pushing Ps (Pedestrian Plazas, Parklets, Pop-up bike lanes)

 Tactical Urbanism is all about action. Also known as DIY Urbanism, Planning-by-Doing, Urban Acupuncture, or Urban Prototyping, this approach refers to a city, organizational, and/or citizen-led approach to neighborhood building using short-term, low-cost, and scalable interventions to catalyze long-term change.

-Tactical Urbanist’s Guide to getting it done

 

    Pedestrian Plazas. Parklets. Pop-up Bike Lanes. All small, short-term tactics to advance long-term neighborhood goals related to street safety, public space, and neighborhood integration. So why are these projects so successful in the short-term but fail to be more influential at a larger scale? 

So what is it about plazas, parklets, and pop-up bike lanes that attract so many people? Many of these projects are created to give the general public a dynamic space to use regardless of financial status or social class. They are temporary by nature so that causes an influx of community members coming to experience them before they vanish. So how can we look at these projects and start to think of them as concrete instead of fluctuating? 

Time Square, as an example, started as a temporary street closure that inspired real change and is now one of the most iconic public spaces in the world. What can architects and planners take away from the success of Time Square that can be incorporated into cities of all scales? How can we bring back the idea of positive public experiences and is that the job of an architect alone?



Comments

  1. Comparing these spaces to time square is very interesting. When I think of implementing plazas like these into cities, I would want them to act as places of pause. Nice areas that break up the rush of living in a place like New York that do a similar thing to central park but on a smaller scale. Instead of a times square type of space I would love green spaces littered across the city in strategic ways.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I may not be informed on the topic but I think there should be more tactical urbanism efforts to create spaces that bring back the original landscape of the place. What if there were more intentional efforts to bring back native plants and species to planned areas? Times Square is basically all hardscape but maybe it would have been more environmentally effective to revert it back to its original state as a green space and not just a place for people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 54% of the Flora in Central park is non-native species: is that GREENWASHING?!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts