Are Suburbs Communities for all? How about cities?
In the final debate for "technology, sustainability, and landscape" one of the questions asked that stuck with me was "Are suburbs communities?"
To me this wasn't the correct question to ask. Here is the official definition of "community".
“A
community is a social unit with commonality such as place, norms, religion,
values, customs, or identity. Communities may share a sense of place situated
in each geographical area or in virtual space through communication platforms.”
To KJ’s point, suburban developments can be areas of a “community” feeling. There is no doubt that extra distance between residents can be irrelevant in many instances and still allow the creation of towns where people associate with one another. As one who comes from a small town in West Virginia, there was a large sense of community through religion, sports, outdoor activities, gyms, etc. Depending on one’s
stances and viewpoints, they can argue that each aspect listed either can bring people together or separate them from the larger community. The general issue I have here is that community is a very broad and vague term. One could argue that the KKK, Nazi Germany, or unethical users on the internet have created
communities among themselves. One may say a better prompt would be “Suburban housing developments create communities for all”. If this were the question, I would have to disagree. As a 'minority' in a predominantly white rural and somewhat “suburban” community, I cannot say that my community created a space ‘for all’. While KJ’s references to her experience in her community are valid and I can't argue against her own community/experience that I know nothing about, rural and suburban communities often have specific beliefs, viewpoints, religions, and political stances that do not create a community feeling for everyone.
To other points in the class, the relationship of public activities are also important. KJ also mentions how she was allowed to share her neighbor’s pool which created a sense of community. Where I’m from, if you were a minority, had a different religion or a different political standpoint from your neighbor, chances are they would not let you use their pool. To conclude, statistically speaking, denser neighborhoods often create a greater sense of community than suburban communities due to the greater diversity and open mindedness of the community at large. While my argument isn’t perfect and there are plenty of examples of negative attributes in densely populated communities; suburban residents often choose the suburbs because they want to avoid different groups, opinions, lifestyles, or even religious views; hence the community may be one based on intolerance, which is an ironic concept of community.
community.
Nick,
ReplyDeleteI find your argument very interesting and compelling. When I lived in the US, we lived in a predominantly white suburban community and we had great neighbors and all the kids and families in our cul-de-sac were friends. However, as a 'minority' I am very well aware that this is not the case everywhere and have definitely heard a good number of stories where the exact opposite happens. I think in my neighborhood, the fact that there was some diversity helped with people being more accepting of differences. For the most part of my life, I grew up in a very dense urban environment in India where I was not in the minority group and it was very different. I had friends from outside just my immediate surroundings and was afforded that opportunity because of the context. I think that community is made by people but being in a denser neighborhood provides you with more opportunities to connect and find similarities with people you can relate to, creating a richer community.