Servants for humanity? (week 10)
“All architects expect
and hope their work will act in some sense as a servant for humanity – to make
a better world. That is the search we should always be undertaking and there are
no clear-cut definitions or assumed pathways.” – Samuel Mockbee
While Mockbee may be taking liberties in assuming the first
part of this statement, the second is very compelling. We spend
a lot of time attempting to define the role of the architect. We’ve considered the importance of user
participation, influence from outside professions, contextual conditions, as
well as the design expertise of the architect him or herself, where even the definition and
scope of that expertise is fairly ambiguous. The differing approaches to discovering
where architects fit into the physical, social and professional spectrums
should suggest an expansion of this role rather than a whittling down. Perhaps there is no
way of defining the role of the architect, and maybe that shouldn’t even be the
point.
During last week’s class regarding spatial justice, Sarah
brought up a fact that should be at the forefront of these discussions: architects
possess the rare skill of design thinking. The value in an architectural
education lies not in the ability to draw a wall section detail, but in the
ability to attack a problem from unseen angles and work in a non-linear fashion
to form an innovative solution. Mockbee states that architecture requires
civic engagement. I believe this is true to
the extent that this engagement is not merely the means to a drawn and constructed
end, but used as a tool removed from the profession to improve the social and political circumstances which
impact so much of the world we live in (including architecture).
Design Thinking - Daniel Newman
Comments
Post a Comment