To BIM or not to BIM
I think there’s a current mood in society that progress has
failed us in different aspects of life. We live longer and healthier but our
lives are blander and the places we live in are more generic. The scientific
process has saved us from peril but has also brought onto us new types of
problems. The future seems full of great opportunities but we are weary because
we’ve seen the disasters that progress can bring. This reaction to change can
be seen in the rise of Populism all over the world and extreme violence in some
corners of the world. Our generation has also been marked by Great Recession,
another symbol of failure of an international order. Surely, a return to
Critical Regionalism is another symptom of this discontent.
Frampton describes critical regionalism as a process of “double
mediation” between universal civilization and world culture. He says that the “mediation
of universal technique involves imposing limits on the optimization of
industrial and postindustrial technology”. This seems to me more relevant now
than any time before, especially with BIM. BIM is bringing construction to a
level of industrialization that was previously only possible in the automobile industry.
BIM is the ultimate tool for the uninspired architect. Millions of different
pieces, some designed and built in different parts of the world, come together
to make a Frankenstein of a building with no regard to local craft, climate, culture, etc. You can drive down the street and tell what buildings were designed with
BIM software because they all have the same bland arrangement of materials and poor understanding of details, how
horrible is that? How do we practice an architecture that is critical of
universality when more and more we are expected to use tools that encourage
that type of architecture? BIM is here and is going nowhere because it is a result of our market. It's another way in which a drive for efficiency forgets about things that aren't easy to put a number and give value to, one of the million of small complexities of life that modernity has overlooked.
Maybe the issue is architects using BIM software as a design tool or limiting factor. Technology should not be used as a crutch, but treated like a challenge that we meet with a critical and creative response (however idealistic that sounds).
ReplyDelete