The Metropolis: Fantasy Land
Koolhaas
presents the interesting idea that urban design has become a response to the
needs of people (as a result of population density) to live in a fantasy. This
new order of design promotes a vertical congestion (seen in section). As technology
advances, so do the possibilities for urban growth, and thus the response to
population density further confuses the reality within the city.
Koolhaas
discusses Coney Island as an example of how a population was removed from
nature’s reality by the technological machines that disguised the beach's overcrowding.
Quantity of fake milk beats limited supplies of real milk, fake horses on a
track beat real horse rides, and electrical lights allow for a 24-hour
experience. These unnatural changes, although distorting reality, are acceptable because they allow for
people to live comfortably in a densely populated site. (Does it matter if we
live in a distorted reality, so long as we appear to be happy?) The idea of
over-population is no longer noticed as people can still accomplish what they
went to the beach to do.
The
invention of the Otis elevator further allowed Manhattan to adapt to its
population growth and added a new level of congestion. Horizontal space is
limited, but our vertical existence is unlimited so long as we have the
technological means. The elevator opened this never imagined possibility.
Multiple uses/programs could now exist in the same square footage of a New York
block; multiple Villas were encased by a unifying structure…bring on the skyscrapers!
However,
as this new world was created, the population was furthering itself from the
reality of nature (and the ground). But don’t worry, it would be ok, because as
Koolhaas mentions, in the “100 Story Building”, each cubicle could become its
own “private existential journey”. Technology had once again provided the
distorted reality of nature, which was sufficient for the population to live;
it still beats the alternative. This
is also evident in the golf course level of the Downtown Athletic Club. Why would
we need to be on an actual golf course when we have murals that represent the
always perfect horizon? The course even has light fixtures above it; you can’t
get those on a real golf course.
With
this convoluted system occurring inside the building, the exterior would need
to be treated differently. To hide the customized mess that was going on
within the skyscraper, a “serene sculptural object” would need to be portrayed
from the street view. This would help to hide the schizophrenic themes occurring
within the building.
The
readings/videos for this week reveal an interesting view on Metropolis living. I’ve
never really considered this view, but it does make perfect sense. I’m not sure
if what we are doing is wrong or right, but if people are living a seemingly
happy existence, it can’t be too bad living in a fantasy. It means people don’t
have an excuse to complain about life.
“The
true ambition of the Metropolis is to create a world totally fabricated by man”
To me, the creation of spaces and inventions that "enhance" the lives of the users were a necessary evil to the growing problem of population density. You're right - if we can't grow out, let's grow up! The idea of a fake reality is troubling to me, but I agree that most people are happy to live in a fantasy rather than suffer the inconvenience of nature and reality.
ReplyDelete