UNdesigned v.s UNconsidered

Undesigned Space as Necessity

It's understandable that there is much debate on whether so-called "undesigned" spaces are good architecture, or even architecture at all. It is in my opinion that as architects, designers, and planners, the negative spaces which are formed [intentionally] by creating [constructing] physical elements, are just as important as the built forms themselves; despite their seemingly undesigned characteristics. For it is these spaces that give users and passersby the ability to create their own experiences [their right to the city] which ultimately brings a project to life. I believe that the intentional creation of "undesigned" space, when located appropriately, is the strongest way to encourage user participation and interaction. For the everyday person who is bound to a monotonous weekly schedule based around designed, constructed, artificial spaces, what better way to 'escape' than to have the freedom to experience the spaces that contradict that schedule, which have no rules, offer no suggestions and allow us to be in control.

Bowman Field: Clemson, SC