Theory into Practice
Examining architecture at a purely theoretical level is necessary
to the evolution of architecture and informs how we are inspired to create a
better environment. Sometimes theories must stay in the theoretical world for
reasons of cost, feasibility, etc. but I think that there are many
circumstances where architectural theorists need to bring their ideas into
practice more often. In class, we talked about how we see a lot of examples of
experimentation with sustainability and occupant comfort at a small scale and
we do not know how to apply them to a larger scale building. Ideas like
Philippe Rahm’s Convective Apartments and Evaporated Rooms where he studies how interior temperatures and body temperature can play a role in design should be carried further into practice so
we can learn from them (for better or worse) and apply them to different
project types and building scales. Understanding how people’s senses should
play into architectural design comes best when placed into real life
situations. In today’s world, things move fast and architecture can feel left
behind at times. By moving theory into practice more quickly, architects can
keep better pace with technology and measures that can create greener, better
functioning buildings that create a better environment for people to live in
and are more attuned to all of our senses.
Convective apartments, Philippe Rahm
Evaporated rooms, Philippe Rahm
I also feel the same about moving theory into practice more. Just like when we talk with professors about the wall section for studio and Building Economics, Costs and Legal Issues, what they told us were different. One of them said "your professor may told you to draw this, but we never do that in real life". I think that makes sense why We need to move theory to practice to test it by the real world.
ReplyDelete