What is the difference between the critical regionalism and regionalism?

You first need to understand the background.The rise in the 1980 s of a stream of regionalism, their critical rationalism of modern architecture and universalism;Criticism of postmodern historicism and nostalgic regional tendencies
Another rescue of modern architecture;Look for local cultural response to universal strategy of civilization.


Is one of the more important works tonnies couple "critical regionalism, architecture and its characteristics in the globalized world, shows the regionalism in the book of history, with the perspective of history focus on the development of the whole architectural regionalism:


1. The classical period (regional differences - empire center) : makes the international style buildings, the ancient Roman architecture formed first climate of different lead to different parts of the housing form, at this time of regionalism is mainly the difference of the physical factors such as regional climate.
2. Magnet type (place spirit) : 17-18 th-century regionalism: the authority of the regional natural landscape vs stiff vs classic universal, individual expression, the regionalism is mainly relative in terms of the classical paradigm of France, Britain a magnet type space of freedom, and no longer comply with the French classical symmetry.
: 3.19 century romantic regionalism (regional) in memory: Goethe was a celebration of the German gothic architecture;British parliament (romantic) : vertical gothic.At this time of the regionalism of ethnic groups representing a region of memory, the background is nationalism, European countries began to find their ethnic identity, to start looking for building on behalf of our nation, it is usually in the sense of regionalism.
Overripe regionalism: 4.20 century for political propaganda service (Hitler racism).
5.20 century 30 s American l. mumford Lewis Munford theory of regionalism: rejected before a variety of regionalism, opposed blindly follow on the technology of "international", to the regionalism of the new life, he is the first systematic reflection from inside the regionalism.


From 1 to 4, can be called the regionalism, focus, respectively, and starting from the five have turned to the tendency of critical regionalism.




And another after Daniel Frampton Kenneth Frampton wrote a book "modern architecture: a critical history" formally put forward the critical regionalism, source of his thinking is just tonnies couples multiple horizon "critical regionalism".In his book he advanced the famous "critical regionalism" tendency of seven characteristics:


1. Refused to give up the idea of modern architecture left heritage, and the pursuit of optimization and normative utopianism of early modern architecture movement distance.
2. Set up and the emphasis on the ground field formed by the structures of feeling, not the building as isolated objects.
3. The building appears as a kind of construct the realization of the fact that, rather than the environment will be built into a series of set type clips
4. Emphasize on the natural environment characteristics of its associated (site), climate and light attention and response, such as opposed to optimize air conditioning technology efforts;Terrain is considered to build configuration wherein the three-dimensional matrix, the local light reveals the work capacity of the main media of the construction of value, expressed in response to climate characteristics.
5. Pay attention to people on the environment of complete experience and cognition, in addition to the vision, to touch, taste, environment temperature, humidity and air flow of feeling the body's response to the environment such as also need to pay attention to.
6. Against the emotional head imitation native, but welcome to attempt another interpretation of local factors, it will foster a contemporary, both open and point to the place of culture, it tends to reverse thinking way to create a "world culture" based on geography.
7. To avoid the biggest impact of universal civilization, look for gaps in a culture of prosperity, and will eventually prove, dependent on a dominant cultural center of civilization development mode, is not sufficient.


Finally introduces an architect: Scarpa Carlo Scarpa, work is famous Castelvecchio Museum
Exhibits fine design: works and dialogue, conversation works and light
History of transparency: each stack make history, to deal with the problems of the larger buildings and urban expression
Fragment and collage: old and new collocation strategy, collage allowed in history, rather than imitate history snippets or refuse to contemporary
Montage strategy: as the integration of the heterogeneous elements allow with bold and confident attitude as a sensitive and voluntary server rather than environment destroyer role
Composition system - symbolic forms: traditional language, universal grammar, not alleged - style
Scarpa's goal lies in the connection from the history and present of create a memorable experience without resorting to historicism.At the same time focus on his handling of goods, construction and the wholeness of space.Regeneration design makes historical monument is more apparent, building recounts a series of stories, but not preaching narrative.

Comments

Popular Posts