Holistic Designers or just architects?
Holistic design is
a term that is continually kicked around professional and academic circles as
an idealistic approach to better design.
For example, if we could be more
collaborative with urban planners, landscape designers, developers, local
government, and local residents then our architecture would be more relevant
and appropriate. In architectural
education we are emphasizing collaboration as the key to a better education
that is more representative of real-world dynamics. It is thought that interconnectedness and
collaboration will save the day. It is an idea we are expected to embrace and is viewed as the solution to many problems, including sustainable architecture.
Moshen Mostafavi presents ecological urbanism as a holistic approach to the design and
management of cities. He challenges the
myopic nature of current sustainability practices in architecture where the
concern for sustainability fails to expand beyond a singular project toward a
more regional approach. Mostafavi views
ecological sustainability as an “opportunity for speculative design innovations
rather than as a form of technical legitimation for promoting conventional
solutions.” In other words, he argues
for a new approach to urbanism that mediates between the opposing forces of a
healthy ecological system and urbanism that hopes to produce new innovations in
sustainable urbanization through the lens of ecology.
Throughout his essay, Mostafavi rails on the limits of our
knowledge as designers and challenges us to be more inclusive and expansive in
our work. He promotes interaction over
separation, density over isolation, a blending of design and planning
disciplines, and ultimately argues that a “transdisciplinary approach of
ecological urbanism gives designers a potentially more fertile means of
addressing the challenges facing the urban environment.”
Holistic design sounds like a great idea but can feel very
overwhelming. As architects, are we
really expected to be landscape designers, urban designers, planners, political
activists, historians, sociologists, anthropologists, and now ecologists? We are moving away from specialization
towards the blurry homogenous group of “design thinkers”. Design thinking is now taught in many
business schools and is a hot topic in the business world. The fail fast, fail early, iterative process
of idea > prototype > evaluate is now a method that can be used to solve
any problem.
When it comes down to it, we are professional tradesmen. We offer a skill that others cannot provide –
why else does the world need good architects? The idea that we are master creators
of renaissance proportion is deluded and pompous. God is not dead and we are not gods. We should most certainly be conscious of our
surroundings on many levels, but at the end of the day we are still just
architects.
Comments
Post a Comment