Chairs III: What's Your Favorite Band?
Re Junkspace: Damn! Remember when Downton Abby was a thing and people were enamored with the articulate sass of the Dowager Countess of Grantham? Maybe? Well, you didn’t miss much if you don’t, and if you ever intend on watching it then your enjoyment of that part of it will surely be diminished after reading Junkspace, because not even the most satisfying of Violet Crawley’s austere jabs comes close to basically anything in Koolhaas’s 15-page-long-single-spaced-all-one-paragagraph (surely an allusion to the very spaces he was excoriating, no?) collection of sick burns concerning the general condition of architecture, an “overripe and undernourishing […] sponsor [of the] collective of brooding consumers in surly anticipation of their next spend, a mass of refractory periods caught in a Thousand Year Reign of Razzmatazz, a paroxysm of prosperity”. Ouch! Barkeep, oblivion, please.
But as Koolhaas points out, “we have built more than did all previous generations put together, but somehow we do not register on the same scales. We do not leave pyramids.”
Our pyramid is garbage, a trillion tiny pieces of plastic that will outlast all of us, a sort of anti-treasure that’s buried in the sand of every beach, floating in every ocean, and blown into every nook and cranny where the wind can carry it.
Bummer! But if architecture is humanistic and the primary concerns of humanity are comfort and entertainment, then given our (and by “our” I’m talking about “us”, the demographic of the people participating in this blog) current collective lifestyle and its trajectory, isn’t junkspace as we know it inevitable? If we’re wired to engage with the latest distraction, if our dopamine receptors fire with each tiny morsel of insubstantial entertainment and if we’ve become accustomed to living like this, are we just going to build spaces that work in the same way? Physical manifestations of the sort of low-quality all-you-can-eat content that we’ve come to expect from our self-populating Instagram feeds and streaming services? Aren’t the spaces described in Junkspace the same as all modern large-scale entertainment and communication platforms? Although it’s hard (for me) to defend a lot of Eisenman’s built work, it’s a lot easier to defend the concept of autonomous architecture in the context of junkspace; the idea that we, as designers, have the option to consider convention and the popular demands of architecture and take a hard pass is tantalizing.
On the flip side, because junkspaces are temporary and are often driven by the forces of commerce, they’re often full of spectacle spaces. Sure, a lot of them are just kind of inhabitable advertisements, but the constant demand for new and exciting content creates a market for spaces and experiences whose primary objective is the generation of interest/excitement; absent the burdens of practicality or durability, designers are free to experiment with and produce spaces that couldn’t exist in the wild without the financial backing of their corporate sponsors. That’s the great thing about high-end retail establishments in first-world countries: many of them are actually very nice and you, a member of the general public, can just walk in and experience them without any obligation. Sure, this is just a brand trying to project its values and, yes, they’re trying to get you to buy stuff so that you, too, can engage in this same act of value signaling and taste having, but where else can I go, for free, if I want to engage with objects of high design?
Hey, just a thought: maybe if we’re honest from the get-go about the fact that we’re designing disposable spaces then we can design recyclable ones instead. Maybe we should mandate it, or at least incentivize it, and maybe we'll end up with building technologies that'll make architecture less wasteful. And while we're at it, if we're going to need a parade of endlessly changing art installations and other visual content, use it as a way to showcase local artists (Anthropologie already does the latter in some instances).
Speaking of flip sides, flippity flips, and flippy floppies, you know the Talking Heads? I don’t have a favorite band, but if I did they’d be in the running for it. Anyway, David Byrne (the lead singer) did a movie back in the ‘80s that I really like called True Stories, which I bring up because Mallrats was the recommended viewing this week.
There’s a great (well, I think it’s great) bit that’s a surrealist salute to the shopping mall. Here’s a link (2 links -- we’re at the mercy of the editing of the video pirates):
First 3 mins: David Byrne introduces us to the modern shopping mall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2vpvT11fjs
Last 4 mins: Surrealist fashion show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ-ZOVJXMes
Or maybe COVID will just be end of junkspaces. Maybe we'll just give up on brick-and-mortar retail and offices, and our junkspaces will just fall into ruin and be reclaimed by nature.
Nothing But Flowers: that's my favorite Talking Heads Song.
Harrison, I liked when you said, "But if architecture is humanistic and the primary concerns of humanity are comfort and entertainment, then given our (and by “our” I’m talking about “us”, the demographic of the people participating in this blog) current collective lifestyle and its trajectory, isn’t junkspace as we know it inevitable?."
ReplyDeleteI think many of us, and to be honest, all of us will end up building some junkspace in the future unless you aren't in architecture anymore, I guess. I mean, it is impossible to not be part of the junkspace train as 21st century designers and architects, and like you said, it is an "inevitable" tangent.
I am pretty sure that junkspace might be my least favorite thing to want to do, build, or make, but I love entertainment, cinema and fashion, and these are catalysts in how we absorb contain as architecture dummies. It is a driver for innovation and creativity. Junkspace come as a reflection of that momentum between reality and fantasy because it excites us and satisfy our hunger for spaces that are out of our imaginative quadrant.
Meaningless to say that I loved the post and all the junk that is in it (by junk mean I the entertaining way you put it together using fragemented puzzle pieces).Hopefully this is one of those posts that I will be referring to later in my career, it reflects our natural state as contain creators, spaces manipulators, and planet earth number one enemy (humans).
"Junk masterpiece" might be the appropriate word I guess, :) .
Thanks for your comment, Moh! I'm with you: I love so many of the things the junkspace promotes and that promote the generation of junkspace. It's a junk vortex, and vortexes are circular. Koolhaus's Junkspace, for me, was an electrifying read in a self-satisfying kind of way. I'm glad we're talking about it as design students and I'm glad that a respected member of the field is calling it was it is. The real question is what's next: is there life beyond junkspace? do we leverage the cyclical nature of disposable architecture and turn it into recyclable architecture? Does e-commerce and Zoom everything just render everything that isn't residential and restaurants obsolete -- do we let it all just fall down and be an open field? When is a "something" of junkspace better than nothing at all? I hope we're reaching a turning point at which the novelties of access and excess are wearing off and we're becoming more critical about the way we produce and consume: i think we can keep doing do both, but we can't be lazy about how we do it anymore.
DeleteYes we can't be lazy about it no more. We got to be more uncomfortable and appreciate the fact that both innovation and social ideals can be reflected in the way we rethink ad design spaces and structures. If we keep pushing our passions for design through unconventional and sometimes "dumb" ideas we might be able to empower the discipline and put it at the crossroads between utopia, rationalism, and reality.
DeleteHey Harrison! Okay first of all loved reading your post and I think you brought up a lot of good thinking points.
ReplyDeleteI liked this statement in particular:
"Hey, just a thought: maybe if we’re honest from the get-go about the fact that we’re designing disposable spaces then we can design recyclable ones instead. Maybe we should mandate it, or at least incentivize it, and maybe we'll end up with building technologies that'll make architecture less wasteful."
This leads into one of your next points with junkspace and the effect of covid...which was actually something I touched on in my blog post as well. Maybe we were saying the same thing just a little differently, but I was wondering on whether covid and the new norm of working from home and online shopping will lead to these junkspaces (which now that I am thinking about it maybe I was referring to junkspaces as the buildings that become unused and abandoned verse those overpopulated spaces which is how Koolhass was referring to junkspaces)... anyhow I think the current time and pandemic is related to this topic and brings up some interesting things to think about.
Thanks for listening to me ramble; I have no idea if what I just said even made sense!
Celia i thought your post was great! I feel like this question is so relevant right now and that we're on the precipice of a junk space (both in the sense of spaces that have been reduced to junk and spaces that are just junky) crisis and that COVID/Zoom has accelerated to the process to the extreme. Maybe things'll change for the better!
DeleteYour point that “isn’t junk space as we know it inevitable?” besides being depressing, really struck me. I’ve already worked on junkspace projects in the past and knew it was garbage. Now with covid, even projects that I didn’t think were junkspace like a cool renovated co-working space in an old industrial building have turned into junkspace as everyone in New York works from home now. Maybe it really is inevitable….
ReplyDeleteI liked your comparison of Koolhaas’s jabs to Downton Abbey’s Violet Crawley. I actually read a few of his “burns” aloud to my boyfriend because I was giggling while reading “Junkspace.” Even his chosen the format of 17 pages of a single paragraph read like a Reddit rant.
Thanks for your comment, Cora! I do feel like it's inevitable and that the inevitability invites us - demands, really - to make a better plan for spaces that will outlast their specific programmatic utility. If we're smart about it, maybe we can turn junk into progress
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"They're not there to shop. They're not there to work. They're just there." This Mallrats movie poster slogan cracked me up and reminded me how much we all love being near things that are exciting, varied and new. Doesn't seem to mater to the public whether its junkspace or not. So maybe the inevitable path toward a world that just keeps building junkspace really isn't that bad. Maybe architects should just accept their part and find ways to enjoy adding to the junkspace themselves. Renewable or not, maybe its just meant to be there. Maybe we just keep layering over old junkspace with new junkspace. It might not be the world we envisioned but it could be interesting. Who knows, might even be more fun than we think! (I'm envisioning something that looks like Coruscant)
ReplyDeletelol on another note, I <3 the Talking Heads. I feel like they would have loved all this junkspace too. Tina Weymouth coulda laid down some funky beats for us to jam to while walking through the next cool "public space near you". I also don't want to have to pick a favorite band, but if you held me up at gunpoint I'd probably say something like "It's Lou Reed and The Velvet Underground for me".
Unimpeachable fav band choice.
Delete