The Buildings that Shape Us
Winston Churchill once said "First we shape our buildings, but then our buildings shape us"; This has rung true for decades, and continues to be true now. We as people learn and grow through our experiences and a big part of those experiences are the built environments that surround us. We may associate some of our negative experiences with places we've been and therefore those places are negative as well, we may also associate some of our best memories to a specific place, making the place a sanctuary of sorts. Regardless, a good building to some is a bad building to others. This is the perspective of our occupants' at least.
The fact of the matter is, buildings like the Denver Art Museum have shaped the people of Denver. Whether it served as a wayfinding tool, a favorite art museum, or an eye-sore that they simply can't forget; This complex piece of architecture has shaped perspectives for the people in the city of Denver. That is what architecture is about, that is what architecture can do, and while we as designers will always be critical, one thing that we can agree on is that we design for people, people who can decide for themselves what they find interesting, what they enjoy, and what they reject.
I truly enjoy the honest perspective of this post. I know there have been plenty of times where I've looked back at an old project and thought how I would have done it differently. I agree with your statement on how architecture is a reflection of society during the time it is created. This explains why so many modern buildings are looked at today as being unappealing. This proves that architecture, at least with regard to its aesthetics, is completely subjective. Even a contemporary home could be loved by some and hated by others.
ReplyDeleteStefan, I agree with you on how architecture is taken subjectively by the masses. I believe that buildings have a sense of power and place that can anchor and mold someone that inhabits the space. Which is why I think that architecture can not be fully understood without being in that space that is where the building is. However architecture can have a symbolic meaning or have a symbolic importance that can hold a social importance. As architects we must be conscious of the symbols of our works and designs and how they may influence the masses.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Stefan. It was interesting that you compared architecture to fashion in a given time period, as I really see this as valid. Also, to your point about architects looking back and wishing they had done things differently in a project, I can totally relate. Sometimes I feel like my projects are never fully complete, because there is always a way that I see I could change it to improve the building itself, or improve the experience of the users.
ReplyDeleteI love the connection to fashion but would challenge myself and other to think about the fashion that has always been worn and never questioned. The un-trendy fashion. Paris Fashion. Minimalist closets are filled with these items. Monochrome, unbranded, well made and high quality pieces that will never go out of style. Ex: a black turtleneck, straight blue jeans, a rain jacket, brown boots, etc...). What does a minimalist's portfolio look like? I think someone should study this! The true sustainable architecture!
ReplyDelete