Calm, Cool and Projected

Projective architecture has always been more appealing and obvious to me. Architecture that accepts and works with the many contingencies and multiplicities within the project is an approach that fits into our ever changing, connected and complicated world.  More so than a critical architecture that operates autonomously.  I need multiplicity to prompt design.  I can’t make anything of value unless constraints exists to prompt action. Architecture is constrained by physical bodies, project needs, material technology, arbitrary and natural boundaries, budgets, time, human desires, and international codes. All of these constraints are the interesting details that make a project unique. Ideally, constraints like these help architects create a unique solution to every site. I can definitely say the ‘cool’ or relaxed mode of discipline is appealing to the way practice for me.  I think one role architects have is to make the design seem effortless while still practicing with the many complexities and programs of the site.  As our industry responds to the looming carbon crisis its also imperative that our designs are responsive and to new technologies and methods of construction that can sequester carbon mass.  This is just another layer of multiplicity that designers must be ready practice within. This means architects and developers not only have to meet the needs for the lifespan of the building but we also have to consider the buildings effect after its lifespan.






Comments

  1. I totally agree with you about the importance of constraints. The primary constraint being that architecture should first seek to satisfy the user. If you find yourself to have the freedom within the constraints to create a beautiful design in the process, that's just a bonus.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I tend to agree with this view. The complexity of a project and the interest for me personally is not the selection of innovative materials or a drastic form just for the sake of architecture but when selections and choices are made as a response. I believe that this is were an architect can really prove there value by taking the inherit challenges in a project and looking at them as opportunities to push boundaries and innovate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really like this post and agree with what you're saying. I think architectures primary purpose is to respond to the needs of its users and its environment. Those needs should be the driving agent behind design decisions. And that doesn't mean that architecture has to be ugly and simplistic either.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts