From Fiction to Fact
Bjarke
Ingels brings up this point of “bigamy” meaning the combining of 2 different
ideas and weaving them together forming a hybrid. Architecture is great
springboard for this kind of tension and way of thinking. Often times in my
architectural education I have taken two totally different ideas and have
blended them resulting in a unique and super intriguing idea. Ingels continues
how architecture allows us to make friction into reality, which then turns into
a fact upon completion. Much like the
example he gives of the powerplant which is also utilized as a ski slope using
one idea to lead to something unconventional giving a unique spin to the norm. This
ideal also allows the architecture to have more than one function helping it
adapt to our ever changing world.
In design,
often times we look to what’s been done to glean ideas from. Though, sometimes
that can be dangerous because we can be too influenced by that design/style and
end up just replicating what already exists instead of inventing something new
as Ingels warns. It is so necessary to research these precedents, they are what
help our projects become stronger and more complex.
Bjarke
Ingels said, “architecture is the canvas for the stories of our lives”. I have
never heard anyone say this about our field and I think there is some truth to
this. We tend to design according to the experiences we have had and to our
ethics and principles. For example, one may have a strong passion for
academia/teaching and thus they maybe led to design and improve k-12
architecture. If we are passionate about our work it will show in how we
present it, as well as the level of detail and depth.
I find it interesting that the BIG design process is obviously influenced by Koolhaas, in the way drawing/diagramming informs design. Yet, OMA embodies an ambivalent spirit, where their architecture can be a product of society or a commentary on it... whereas BIG is incredibly optimistic and convinced that architecture has the power to change the world for better.
ReplyDeleteI've felt always felt conflicted about the BIG ski slope power plant. It's funny, part of me really loves it and part of me also kind of hates it too. I can't make up my mind whether its a fantastic and unique utilization of an architectural form that would otherwise not have been usable by anybody other than its function as a power plant, or if its really a cheap and cute gimmick.
ReplyDelete