Change that is Life
“Through the medium of the Skyscraper, each site in the
Metropolis accommodates— in theory at least—an unstable and unforeseeable
combination of superimposed and simultaneous activities whose configuration is
fundamentally beyond the control of architect or planner” (Koolhass, 328).
In
Koolhaas's Culture of contradiction he discusses the instability that exists within
the skyscraper and the introduction of the elevator. The elevator, an invention
not produced or intended by Architects, forces the rise of buildings within the
urban fabric, particularly within New York. By introducing sky rises or urban
vertical grids, the programs housed inside the buildings are disconnected with
the monolithic, sculptural exterior facades. The internal programs constantly
change in an ebb and flow of needs. How do we as architects fix the instability between the two and introduce a “culture of congestion”, as Koolhass puts it.
How do business executives interact with marketing agents if the exterior
sheath hides the changing interior? Can this be solved with mix-use
developments? How can social interaction and cultural congestion be turned into
a positive aspect of vertical living?
While there is a thought that the exterior sheathing should reflect what is happening on the interior, I don’t think it should. Why would anyone want to see the interior complexities that do not make sense from the exterior. In an environment where already buildings within a block are completely different and add to the chaos of the city, I can’t imagine another layer of confusion and incoherence. Especially since one has no control of what happens on the interior.
ReplyDelete