Any Site Can Be Flat With A Bulldozer
“The bulldozing of an irregular topography into a flat site is clearly a technocratic gesture which aspires to a condition of absolute placelessness, whereas the terracing of the same site to receive the stepped form of a building is an engagement in the act of “cultivating” the site.” Kenneth Frampton
I found that this quote hit me to the core. In undergrad I was just stepping my toes into software and felt that with technology we could design on flat surfaces wherever. I mean why not? We do in fact have bulldozers that can flatten any site and allow for massive buildings or buildings as sculptural art pieces. In my opinion one of the major flaws of the Modern movement in architecture was the lack of placelessness in most of the projects built at that time.
Last semester in Professor Dustin Albright’s mass timber
studio, I was tasked with designing an elementary school in Forest Acres, Sc
where the site had rolling hills in a suburban neighborhood. I could have
responded as the modernists did and flatten the site or fill in the cavities
and build over it; however, I utilized the slope of the site to push the
building down into the site to not tower over the surrounding houses. So in
short I agree with the idea in critical regionalism that architects need to
respond to topography, context, and the climate.
I agree that ultimately when considering the site and topographic changes of a place you will design a more interesting, and complex building in the long run. While it is at least my first instinct to think of my sites as flat because (isn't that easier?) the projects never have as much depth or relation to the site in the end. A project is not as successful, I think, when you could literally just pick up your project and drop it anywhere...which I think partially is what Frampton is getting at.
ReplyDelete