On Scarcity
“The professional challenge…is how to
avoid being so stunned by the power of modern technology and economic affluence
that one does not lose sight of the fact that people and place matter."
What I love about this quote is that it forces
us to consider the fact that, as a society, we are constantly working to design/create/produce
the best and newest version of just about everything – utilizing ever-evolving modern
technology and economic affluence to do so.
I think that, often times, we get so caught up in thinking “how can
this perform better than its predecessors” that we start to forget just how
important the consideration and inclusion of people and place are in that
equation.
One point of discussion today
that I found particularly thought-provoking was the idea of designing buildings
using new materials with the intent that the building will “use less” and ultimately
prove more efficient and sustainable throughout its life vs one that is
constructed using only reclaimed/recycled materials but is much less efficient. When resources allow, I think it can be extremely
difficult to find that balance between designing a highly efficient, high-tech,
long-lasting building as opposed to one that uses the absolute minimum to
accomplish nothing more than what is absolutely necessary or desired. This ties back to our discussion in class
this week about an architect that feels he/she knows what is best for society and
works to transform it accordingly, vs one who realizes and accepts when nothing
needs to be done – working, instead, to design with minimal impact in carefully
considering what additions/updates are really necessary for the betterment of both
people and place. I think many of us
would argue that we associate with the later but, in reality, often design towards
the former.
What it really comes down to is that we, as the designers and architects, need to advocate for justice – not only social justice, but also environmental justice both at the smaller building scale and the larger city scale.
Great post, and it tuchdown on the fact that architects can be part of the decision making process, not just sit on the bench and wait for city leaders to call them on the field.
ReplyDeleteI think you articulated this idea well! I also really loved the story of the architect who decided no new construction was needed- I hope that we can be part of firms that not only have the self awareness to do that, but also the funds.
ReplyDelete