Façade : The Final Frontier?

 


Rem Koolhaus believes that the façade is now quickly becoming the Architects final frontier for practicing design. The last thing that the architect will release ownership of. It has become a detached idea from the rest of the building. I worry that Koolhaus is right. Interior arrangement of spaces in unique ways that are shaped an molded are too inefficient and costly. It is much easier to wave the Façade bone in front of the architect while you negotiate away design control over the interior. However, I believe both should work in tandem and relate to each other in a meaningful way. Each part of the building should flow into the next, revealing new layers that work together, like an tulip revealing itself in spring for the first time. The idea that architects would no longer focus on the relationship of the two and allow them to be grafted together is something that seems to bring a sense of dishonesty to our own profession. Every part of the building is important and should be crafted so that however you experience it, it has a positive impact on the atmosphere of the daily user. Otherwise the building becomes a flashy shell that could have been a postcard instead. 

Comments

  1. I agree with you and really hope architecture doesn't trend towards a superficial façade design profession just because its cheaper to attach a box to a expensive façade because that would suck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But! Maybe it's a subcategory of the profession. Do we really want to hand over the keys to that part as well? To let somebody else decorate our sheds? Not on my watch! I agree with the sentiment, though: i don't want architecture to be pushed into this place where we're these sort-of exterior decorators (unless we want to be, i might actually enjoy that). But i think that if anyone's going to to it then it should be us. Plus, the facade is the way that most people will engage with the building, so if we've got something to say or a cool design to show off then it's kind of our canvas/billboard. That's my 2 cents, anyway.

      Delete
    2. Really loved the way you phrased this, Harrison. If we have interior decorators, why not exterior decorators? I guess the point is that interior decorators are not licensed architects and we take offense that an exterior decorator is somehow different. The architect as a profession is not supposed to be specialized, but knows a little about a lot of things. Why can't we do it all?

      Delete
    3. @Harrison...Very Venturi-esque! I too think we should protect our Decorated sheds too, but my favorite buildings always have some kinda cool interior decoration as well

      Delete
  2. Yeah I'm fine with never doing interiors - if they would just raise ceiling heights by a few feet it would solve a good chunk of the problems anyway.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts