Pre-Retroactive Manifestos?
I found the topic of retroactive manifestos this week very
interesting. Learning how buildings, building complexes, and downtown strips that
developed seemingly at random and with no architectural intelligence or thought
can become the subject of deep study and philosophical debate when analyzed in
retrospect makes me wonder: will the spaces that we design simply because they
fill a need someday be put on a pedestal and analyzed with the same depth as the
examples in class? It seems to me that the architects who designed the examples
either truly felt that their idea would be successful and would benefit society
if it were implemented (in the case of le Corbusier’s Plan Voisin) or that they
laid out their structures where there was space, adding flashy touches and signs
where possible to draw customers in (in the case of much of the Los Vegas
Strip). Either way, the design work, whether intentional or not, went unappreciated
for a long time until someone started analyzing them on a deeper level. Will
our work someday follow the same path?

I think there’s certainly an opportunity on it depending on what’s designed or who draws attention to it, but a lot of that will just depend on who does or doesn’t choose to recognize it and draw more attention to it.
ReplyDelete