Balancing Tradition and Innovation
Of the six points in Kenneth Frampton's Essay "Toward a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance," I found that his explanation on tectonic cultures to be the most interesting and applicable to our work. This point refers to the diverse traditions of construction and craftsmanship seen across the globe and how these techniques of construction, material, form, and craft can influence contemporary architecture, creating buildings that are culturally and environmentally rooted in place. Certain techniques can be closely tied to a specific culture or region, reflecting much of its history, people, climate conditions, and reveal the identity of a place. Frampton's emphasis on the importance between preserving tradition and embracing innovation, rather than simply copying old styles or methods, is crucial when designing in locations with rich heritage. Can you think of a good example of a building that does a good job balancing these two aspects?
Yes, and I think the desire to strike a "balance" between innovation and tradition must acknowledge that any tradition was at one time novel. The idea that identity (in places like Charleston and Venice) can be tied indefinitely to the prevailing attitudes of one era goes directly against the idea of tradition.
ReplyDelete