Interior is the New Exterior

 


   I always find the theoretical discussions around the “envelope” fascinating. There seems to be a sort of mysticism around the exterior skin of contemporary buildings - like a newly discovered freedom that architects can unlock and play with on a technological level. Most lectures and presentations by current architects involve some sort of deep dive on a facade technological innovation that drove the project aesthetically and technically. Contemporary structural engineering has allowed - and even encouraged - the facade to be a separate element layered on the outside of the building structure. Yet, interiors are still usually drywall. I’m a part of this moment in architectural history myself, where the exterior is a place of play and intentional design, but the interior is still on default. However, some architects are already on the path of considering the interior as a part of the building “envelope”, freeing it from constraints and making intentional use of it to shape the experience. Inaki Abalos points out the interior as the “soul” of architecture - will the interior be the playground of the next generation of architects?


Comments

  1. Micah, I'm glad to see you made these conclusions as well. There are numerous buildings I can think of which are known for their interiors, but far more for their exteriors. Unfortunately, when visiting any of these, it is those known for their interiors which leave a much greater impact on me after visiting.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts